Skip to content

  • News
  • Health
  • Food
  • Science
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact Us !
  • Toggle search form

DC Judge Partially Grants Trump’s Request For More Time to File Motions In Jan. 6 Case

Posted on February 5, 2024 By Star No Comments on DC Judge Partially Grants Trump’s Request For More Time to File Motions In Jan. 6 Case

DC Judge Partially Grants Trump’s Request For More Time to File Motions In Jan. 6 Case

The federal judge presiding over former President Donald Trump’s election interference case in Washington, D.C., gave him a victory of sorts in a ruling she issued on Tuesday.

In a four-page opinion, U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan granted Trump’s legal team extra time to file motions regarding evidence in the case, The Messenger reported.

“Trump’s attorneys may file motions for subpoenas until Nov. 27, and motions seeking to compel prosecutors to produce evidence by Dec. 13. Previously, the deadline for those filings was scheduled for Nov. 9,” the report said. “The types of motions covered by the order deal with discovery–the legal term for the exchange of records and information between parties prior to trial–rather than legal arguments.”

The ruling is a partial victory for the former president after his legal team filed a motion last week asking the judge for a Feb. 9, 2024, deadline to file motions for subpoenas and to allow motions to compel on an ongoing basis.

Last week, Trump’s attorneys said that federal prosecutors had turned over some 13 million pages of documents in the case, arguing they needed more time to review them.

Late last month, Chutkan threw the former president a lifeline in a late Sunday filing.

Newsweek reported that Chutkan turned away a request from the Department of Justice to put Trump in jail for violating a gag order she re-imposed on him. In a footnote reinstating the gag order, the judge denied federal prosecutors’ request to incorporate her order into the conditions of Trump’s release.

“Even assuming that request is procedurally proper, the court concludes that granting it is not necessary to effectively enforce the order at this time,” she wrote.

The order lifted a temporary hold she placed on her initial gag order, determining that “the right to a fair trial is not [Trump’s] alone but belongs also to the government and the public.”

Chutkan “also denied Trump’s request to issue a long-term stay of the order, which bars the former president from publicly targeting court personnel, potential witnesses, or the special counsel’s team, while his appeal of it played out,” CNN added.

Former federal prosecutor and elected state attorney Michael McAuliffe told the outlet that the judge was very likely merely being “careful and deliberate” in her ruling because the case has drawn immense scrutiny.

“She certainly knows her every action, including small decisions about the gag order, will be scrutinized and appealed,” McAuliffe told Newsweek. “As such, she is taking a decidedly incremental approach. A good judge knows to wait until issues are ripe for resolution.”

Earlier this month, Chutkan temporarily froze the gag order she previously issued against the 45th president “to give the parties more time to brief her on the former president’s request to pause the order while his appeal of it plays out,” CNN reported at the time.

The outlet added: “Chutkan also said that the Justice Department has until Wednesday to respond to Trump’s request for a longer pause on the gag order and that Trump would have until the following Saturday to reply to the government’s filing. Trump has already appealed the gag order to the DC Circuit Court of Appeals and in a 33-page filing on Friday, his attorneys urged Chutkan to pause the order while that appeal plays out.”

Post Views: 714
News

Post navigation

Previous Post: She lived on the streets, but she did not beg for money. She was holding a note in her hand and asking people to read it. After 16 years, someone stopped and read the note. Then everything changed. Here’s what it says on paper
Next Post: Woman Wants To Rename Certain Body Parts Because They Are “Offensive”

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2026 .

Powered by PressBook WordPress theme

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}