Skip to content

  • News
  • Health
  • Food
  • Science
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact Us !
  • Toggle search form

Texas Judge Issues Restraining Order Against Beto O’Rourke’s Nonprofit Over Alleged Illegal Fundraising for AWOL Democrats

Posted on August 12, 2025 By Star No Comments on Texas Judge Issues Restraining Order Against Beto O’Rourke’s Nonprofit Over Alleged Illegal Fundraising for AWOL Democrats

Fort Worth, Texas – A Texas district court has temporarily shut down fundraising efforts by a nonprofit founded by former Democratic congressman and presidential candidate Beto O’Rourke, following accusations from the state’s attorney general that the group illegally financed Democratic lawmakers who fled the state to block Republican legislation.

On Friday evening, Judge Megan Fahey of Tarrant County granted a temporary restraining order against O’Rourke’s organization, Powered by People, after reviewing a petition filed earlier that day by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton. The order halts the group from raising money or offering financial assistance connected to the lawmakers’ departure.

The case stems from a political showdown in Austin, where dozens of Democratic state legislators left Texas to prevent the Republican-controlled legislature from passing a controversial redistricting plan. According to Paxton’s office, Powered by People allegedly provided funding for the lawmakers’ airfare, hotel accommodations, transportation, and even daily fines levied against them for skipping the legislative session.

In her ruling, Judge Fahey – a Republican appointee of Governor Greg Abbott – wrote that the defendants had engaged in “unlawful fundraising practices” that either directly violated Texas law or caused Democratic lawmakers to break it.

“Consumers have and continue to suffer irreparable harm through these unlawful acts because they are making political contributions that are being used to fund personal expenses and violate state law,” the order stated.

The restraining order effectively freezes O’Rourke’s group from continuing its support for the lawmakers while the legal battle moves forward.

Political Stakes and Fierce Words
O’Rourke, who has remained a high-profile figure in Texas politics since his 2018 Senate bid against Ted Cruz, issued a fiery statement following the court’s decision. He accused Paxton of using the legal system to intimidate and silence those advocating for voting rights.

“They want to make examples out of those who fight so that others won’t,” O’Rourke said. “Paxton’s filed a restraining order to try to take us out of the fight. He wants to stop us from fighting Trump’s attempt to steal the five congressional seats he needs to hang on to power. But I’m not going anywhere.”

O’Rourke also vowed to speak at a planned rally in Fort Worth the following day, calling it part of his effort to “stop the power grab” in Texas politics.

Paxton, in a brief but pointed response on social media, dismissed O’Rourke’s objections:

“Cry more, lib. You lost in court because you’re breaking the law and deceiving Texans. We absolutely will make an example out of law breakers.”

The Broader Conflict
The legal clash reflects deep partisan divisions in Texas over election laws, redistricting, and the limits of political protest. In 2021 and again in 2025, Democratic lawmakers used the tactic of leaving the state to deny Republicans the quorum needed to pass certain bills. While Republicans argue such actions undermine the democratic process, Democrats contend they are exercising the only leverage available to protect voting rights and fair representation.

For Paxton’s office, the lawsuit represents an effort to close off what they view as an illegal channel of outside financial support for lawmakers evading legislative duties. For O’Rourke and his supporters, it is an attempt to silence political opposition and stifle grassroots activism.

The temporary restraining order will remain in effect until a full hearing can be held, where both sides will have the opportunity to present evidence and arguments.

Post Views: 975
News

Post navigation

Previous Post: Fmr Capitol Police Chief Gives Pelosi a ‘Reminder’ About J6 After She Blamed Trump
Next Post: President Trump Issues Secret Order — These People Should Be TERRIFIED

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2026 .

Powered by PressBook WordPress theme

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}