Skip to content

  • News
  • Health
  • Food
  • Science
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact Us !
  • Toggle search form

Angelina Jolie’s former security guard comes out with shocking allegations against her in Brad Pitt case

Posted on May 12, 2024 By Star No Comments on Angelina Jolie’s former security guard comes out with shocking allegations against her in Brad Pitt case

Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt’s divorce has been incredibly public, and the fallout seems to be incredibly nasty. Now it seems some new information is coming out.

Keep reading to know more about what the latest update is.

A former security guard who worked for Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie is coming out with some disturbing allegations against the actress and what she did while married to Pitt.

In the court documents that have now been obtained by the media, it seems that Pitt’s lawyers are saying that a former security guard named Tony Webb was told that Jolie had told the children not to speak to Pitt when their custody visits happened.

The documents also alleged that Jolie attempted to use non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) to threaten the security guards into silence about this.

The documents are part of the years-long legal battle between both exes over their joint Château Miraval vineyard. In this case, there has been much back-and-forth over the use of NDAs and other issues.

According to the documents, Webb was the “head of Jolie’s security detail for two decades, and he remained in that role for approximately four years after the couple divorced.”

Webb stated that Jolie “required him and his contractors to sign NDAs relating to various personal and professional details of her, and her family’s, life.”

After the couple filed for divorce, they had a major custody battle over their six children. According to the documents, Webb claimed he “received multiple calls from Jolie’s representative, who told Mr. Webb to remind his staff that they had entered into NDAs with Jolie and that if they testified in a custody proceeding, Jolie would sue them.”

Webb said that he had conveyed the message to his contractors, and both of them confirmed that they would testify if they were to be subpoenaed.

The documents further claimed that “one of them told Webb that ‘he would testify about statements he overheard that Ms. Jolie made to the children, encouraging them to avoid spending time with Mr. Pitt during custody visits.’”

The documents also stated that the “the two security contractors both testified” despite being threated with being sued and shortly after, Mr. Webb’s company was fired by Jolie.

Webb himself does not claim to have heard Jolie’s directive instructing the children not to interact with Pitt during custody visits. He now also works for Pitt.

Jolie’s attorney, Paul Murphy has since then addressed the media over this matter. He said in a statement, “Mr. Pitt’s continued attempt to equate common NDAs for security personnel and housekeepers covering confidential information employees learn at work, with him demanding an expanded NDA to ensure the continued coverup of his deplorable actions remains shameful.” “This case is not about NDAs in general, but about power and control. All Angelina has ever wanted was separation and health, with positive relationships between all members of their family, including Mr. Pitt. She looks forward to the day when he is finally able to let her go,” the statement further read.

The latest filing comes after over a month after Jolie’s lawyer filed documents claiming that Pitt had been physically abusive toward her even before the alleged infamous plane incident of 2016. That incident, according to documents, was the final straw in asking for a divorce.

The motion that Jolie’s legal team filed in early April, most revolved around the dispute over their shares of ownership in their French winery estate, Château Miraval.

Her legal team filed a motion asking the court to compel Pitt and his legal team to provide “responses” and “documents” that explained why the actor “suddenly conditioned his purchase of Jolie’s share of Miraval on her agreeing to a greatly expanded NDA now covering Pitt’s personal misconduct, whether related to Miraval or not.”

Jolie firmly claims that this move to demand NDAs was Pitt’s attempt to “cover up” the alleged abuse against Jolie and their children.

Pitt was never charged with a crime after authorities investigated the 2016 plane incident.

In contrast to what Jolie’s legal team is saying, Pitt’s lawyers allege that it was Jolie and her team who requested a “broader” NDA.

What do you think of this entire situation? Let us know in the comments. Share this with others who might be interested in this update.

Post Views: 541
News

Post navigation

Previous Post: Donald J. Trump’s Oldest Sister Maryanne Trump Barry Dead at 86 – Cause Of Death Revealed
Next Post: Bruce Willis’ Daughter Tallulah Recently Was Diagnosed As An Adult, And We Are Devastated

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2026 .

Powered by PressBook WordPress theme

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}